Monday, September 28, 2026

4 Posts Not Full of AI-Industry Reality TV Drama!

Can it (the title) be true? Let's see.


From the very rational "AI as a Normal Technology" (formerly "AI Snake Oil") website.

AI existential risk probabilities are (still) too unreliable to inform policy

How speculation gets laundered through pseudo-quantification

I'm going to characterize this, as always, extremely well researched & written post as, there is no data, no logic, for us to compute probabilities of "AI doom" scenarios.

So what does that tell us about the folks preaching these scenarios? Directors of Reality TV shows?


Next up from The Glyph, via his "Decyphering the Glyph" blog. The Glyph apparently is a very accomplished open source Python contributing software developer, Glyph Lefkowitz.

What Would A Serious AI Product Look Like?

Every “AI” tool is missing critical features that you would need if you wanted to do real work with them. What would those look like, if they existed?

A very good read. I noticed him espousing something I mentioned (I think) a few months ago:

No First-Person Output, No Apologies

There is no reason for a software development or research tool to use first-person language to describe itself. They should not do so. In fact they should not be allowed to do so.

There is also no reason that they should ever apologize. It is a waste of everyone’s time; it’s a waste for the chatbot to generate the apology, it’s a waste for the user to read the apology, and it’s a waste for the user to respond to the apology. Yet they unfailingly do this upon every correction.


Next, from Daron Acemoglu, a 2024 Nobel laureate in economics and Institute Professor of Economics at MIT, via Project Syndicate.

Distorted Intelligence at the AI Frontier

The real problem for the frontier AI labs is not that their models are too powerful and already “misaligned” with the goals their creators set for them. Rather, it is that the models are being trained in ways that may be leading to a type of intelligence that will become less predictable.

...

This is what I mean by distorted intelligence. If my suspicion is correct, what we are dealing with is not a model racing toward superintelligence, but a brittle house of cards that becomes more and more likely to malfunction and collapse as we demand more from it.

This reminds me of Cory Doctorow's assertion - I can't find a link, so from memory - "The Luddites weren't opposed to technology. They just wanted a say in who it was for, in who benefitted from it."

This is similar but different. I hadn't thought about it before, but, yes, apparently LLM training has been slanted to the business models of the frontier AI companies. I would summarize these as, create as many chatbot addicts as possible. I think we saw mention of this some posts back.

Wow, these guys need to be terminated with prejudice.


From Gary Marcus. He has been such a fighter for a vision of AI beyond "autocomplete on steroids" - which he coined.

I hate to see him drinking so much of the koolaid.

BREAKING: Florida seeks injunction against OpenAI

The big news in the media this morning is that Jensen (“What, me worry?”) Huang has announced a platform for “AI Agent Safety”.

I mean seriously?

LLM-based agents remind me of the 1st PCs & MS-DOS: who has time or resources for security? If we worry about security, we'll never be able to ship a product!

I guess 1 advantage of being 75 YO is that I can say, yes, we have seen this bullshit before.


Here's the home page/directory for my posts on Bullshit. This is post #153.

Sunday, September 27, 2026

The Shan Has Fit The Hit - September 25-27

Goddamm, I am so trying to get caught up with these stories, but now that GenAI/LLMs/Agents are "tonight's top story" day after day after day, it's tempting to declare victory & turn it over to the adults.

Except, the adults appear, more often than not, to be buying into the Reality TV histrionics of the the entire GenAI/LLM industry: OpenAI, Anthropic, Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Nvidia, Broadcom. The Mag 7+.

OK, I just pasted 12 article dividers. How far can I get? I've been breaking at the end of the day, but, to clear this backlog, I may leave the post open until tomorrow & finish it then. Monday is my day off - no exercise, no shaving, solid food for breakfast. Maybe I can get 'er dun.


From the New York Times.

Being a Doctor Will Never Be the Same After A.I.

I have a confession: A.I. is making me a better doctor. And I worry that it’s making doctors-in-training worse.

We've seen this before. Yes, he is right about doctors-in-training: if they use AI, they will never develop their own skills. Their brains will never develop.

But, he is deluding himself about the effect of AI on his own brain. Study after study shows, AI use erodes the skills of even accomplished practioners.


From 404 Media.

Podcast: OpenAI Admits AI is Killing the Internet

Microsoft and OpenAI admit it; how we got AI slop onto a real band's Spotify page; and AI agent spam is here.

Seriously, fuck these guys. Shut them down, with prejudice. Let academia carry on GenAI research.

Of course, these guys are practicing capitalism at its finest worst, at this point I could maybe be jailed for expressing opposition to such fine assholes capitalists.


From security expert Bruce Schneier.

On Anthropic’s AI Misuse Report

Earlier this month, Anthropic published a long report detailing all of the Claude misuses it detected. Daniel Meissler usefully summarized the report into 117 findings.

117??? Spoiler alert, you ain't seen nothing yet. These companies are intentionally careless to the point of incompetence, because it creates such great drama to keep their fucking bubble inflated.


From Gary Marcus.

BREAKING: OpenAI’s security fiasco explodes — and could tank Jensen Huang’s reputation

More and more facts are coming out and they are absolutely damning

Damning??? No $T IPO???

Jensen Huang, the 7th richest oligarch in the world, cares shit about his reputation. He's just doing rope-a-dope, trying to be on both sides of any accusations, to protect his $$$. What would make you think anything different?


From economist Jared Bernstein.

AI Companies Are In a Race Against Time

They may disemploy us; they may wipe us out. But right now, their lack of profitability underscores our bubble case.

Bubble? Bubble? Bubble?

As I have I think said a few x now, the GenAI industry strategy is now switched to "stall, stall, stall", to put off the day when NOONE can deny that these companies will ever be profitable.


From the Persuasion SubStack of Sam Kahn.

The Anti-Social Media

Some survey results on the uses of AI.

The precis: social media fucks up human relationships, particularly for young people.

Chatbots fuck up human relationships even worse. Particularly for young people.

Hey, no worries, techbros going to be making $T, I'm sure they'll pay for everyone's therapy!


From Will Lockett's Newsletter on SubStack.

The 'AI Slowdown' Is Utter Bullshit

It's corporate subterfuge all over again.

Ahhh, well said, Will, well said!

I think he & I are on the same team!


From Bethany McLean, a financial journalist & an author of “The Smartest Guys in the Room”, via the New York Times.

What Happens if the A.I. Bubble Bursts

This technology may be critical to the future of the United States, but preserving it doesn’t mean we have to bail out the private entities that are leading the field at this particular moment, nor does it mean we have to protect the fortunes of their investors and executives. The solution to the whole ever-expanding A.I. terror starts with remembering the lessons of the 2008 crisis: No company should be too big to fail.

Ugh, already they are starting with the "too big to fail" verbiage.

Please, tell me, what exactly would be the downside if Generative AI, LLMs, chatbots, agents, were to disappear tomorrow?

If I no longer have to figure out creative ways to get past fucking chatbots to be able to talk a human being - I don't care where in the world they are - I will sacrifice a bull or whatever, to Mercury, or whoever the god of commerce currently is.


September 26. From Gary Marcus. Remember when we thought 117 was a big number?

BREAKING: AI agent incident toll has risen to tens of thousands

Meanwhile, the US government appears to be paralyzed

Scoop: from Axios.
Scoop: Top AI companies probing 10s of thousands of security indicents.
Oops?

Error rates (=== failed to accomplish its task) for LLM-based agents I have seen to be 10-50%. Not so good.

But, on top of that, the genie effect - people weren't careful enough about that they wished for, & the genies, just following orders, wreaked havoc. Gawd, can we shut these things down?

Yes, sometimes they work. Whoopie!

Other times, they book people trips to places that don't exist - but, the places sound really plausible.

Or, they break into places they have no reason going, because they think it might help them fulfill the tasks given to them by their (clueless) human masters.

But, even before "AI": you could build scripted bots, written in perl, or PHP, or python & tell them to go attack places & they would go & do their best. GenAI agents are somewhat better at this stuff, but, it is not really any kind of new tech or existential challenge. (AI as Normal Technology)

All these breakins are due to incredibly incompetent security practices at Anthropic & apparently the worst, OpenAI. They should face criminal charges for this, IMO.


From the Apricitas Economics Substack of Joseph Politano.

AI and the Fall? of the Creative Class

America is Losing Hundreds of Thousands of Jobs in Media, Film & the Arts. How Much is AI to Blame?

Lots of charts (yay!), I'd say, in general, it doesn't look good.

Still maybe the charts are saying, you can no longer earn a living from these creative jobs. So, we know that these jobs need to be done, so this is a case for Universal Basic Income, to let creatives be creative & not worry about the $$$.


Here is a voice I have not heard from in a while, Namez Raam. I think he wrote a very good sci-fi sequence.

Can AI self-improvement overcome diminishing returns?

AI self-improvement may not be powerful enough to overcome diminishing returns. Even RSI may not lead to a fast takeoff to ASI (superintelligence).

Just from his phrasing, Namez seems to be A Believer. But, his approach to the subject seems to be scientific. & I think his analysis of RSI (Recursive Self Improvement) is the same as mine, based on what is being published: no way, no how, error rates are way too high. At these kind of error rates, you immediately spiral downward into Degenerative AI, aka Model Collapse.


Finally! Will Lockett again.

Microsoft Knew How Horrific Their AI Push Was

But they did it anyway.

It's so nice to have Will on my team!

This, based on Microsoft documents released to the court trying the trial of the theft of the content of the entire world by GenAI training bots. Reading this, it is indeeed horrific.

In 1999, I was working on a Y2K upgrade plus client-server to web-based product upgrade. Maybe 150 consultants working on the product. Me & my employee & 2 Canadians basically made the whole project work.

The whole thing was using Microsoft tech. I've hated Microsoft since they produced the crappy PCs whose legacy still is that most computers are inherrently insecure.

So one day, on the white board of the main developer workroom, I wrote "Death to Microsoft".

My coworker spoke Italian, Egyptian, & something else. He added those translations.

The Indians added Urdu + ??? The Chinese added ???

After a week, we had "Death to Microsoft" in 52 languages on that whiteboard!

Of course, at that point, management got involved & told us we were intimidating our Microsoft partner consultants onsite - 1 of whom was a gun nut who liked to flash his .45 - so the board got erased. I think that was before smartphones, so no one captured an image :-(

So, you know, it's really kind of sad that, I think due to human nature, we love to become fanboys for new tech companies: Google and "don't be evil"; Apple's various rebel marketing campaigns.

But, we should never forget: we are dealing with corporations, the semi-immortal organisms that use humans as neurons and/or gut flora. They care nothing about us, nothing about the planet. They care only about $$$. They must be stopped.

The transformer really generated some amazing shit! Who could have imagined that 1 algorithm, coupled with $M of GPU chips, could be such an incredibly good next-word-guesser?

The next-word-guessed outputs are really amazing - a talking dog, a dancing bear!

But, this totally a "close, but no cigar" deal. The tech is too unreliable, you cannot build reliable systems on it. IMO.


Yay! Caught up!

Here's the home page/directory for my posts on Bullshit. This is post #152.

Saturday, September 26, 2026

The Shan Has Hit The Fit - September 23-24

Hmmm. Reasoning Language Models, RLMs. Sounds promising. From Bruce Schneier.
Research on Models Engaging in Genie-Like Behavior

New paper: “Self-Jailbreaking: Language Models Can Reason Themselves Out of Safety Alignment After Benign Reasoning Training.”

Abstract: We discover a novel and surprising phenomenon of unintentional misalignment in reasoning language models (RLMs), which we call self-jailbreaking. Specifically, after benign reasoning training on math or code domains, RLMs will use multiple strategies to circumvent their own safety guardrails.

It's really interesting to see fairy tales come true: when dealing with genies, be very careful what you wish for.

I'm surprised I have not heard more on the RLMs. It certainly doesn't justify a tag at this point. I'm guessing that I have not heard more because, unlike next word guessing once you have the transformer architecture, this shit is hard.


The UN has made Gary Marcus happy. I am still disappointed & concerned that this is mostly being framed in the narrative of the AI Labs.

Historic UN Security Council Briefing on AI

We all agree on what needs to be done. Now let’s do it.

...

The only real false note came from some self-congratulatory hype in the speeches of Altman and Amodei, especially Amodei’s.

Wow, those false notes are a shocker - NOT!


September 24. The Age of the Grift seems to also be The Age of Reality TV. We have the government of the US as a Reality TV Show. The ongoing drama of the AI Labs - stop us before we destroy everything! - is cut from the same cloth. & for the same end - to swindle people out of money. Capitalism, FTL.

This by Nvidia's Jensen Huang - currently the 7th richest oligarch in the world at $195B. He must be desperate about something. This whole "slow development down" thing is the whole GenAI industry desperately trying to keep the bill from coming due. Yah, there's going to be profit & ROI RSN (Real Soon Now)! We just should slow things for our (never-to-be-profitable) products for safety's sake!

LOL, what a grift! From Gary Marcus.

“I think the answer is we have to shut the labs down” - Jensen Huang

OpenAI hacks a foreign government — and the US faces its most critical AI test yet.

Marcus strongly identifies OpenAI as a very bad actor in this drama. I think this next from a footnote is a great idea.
There is a giant loophole here that Congress should address. A lot of the legal definitions for computer crimes require intent, and the AI companies can argue that their software has no intent. We must expand the scope of the computer-crime laws to include wholesale negligence and repeated crimes.


From Yanis Varoufakis (a former finance minister of Greece, Leader of the MeRA25 party, Professor of Economics at the University of Athens, and a senior research fellow at Fudan University) via Project Syndicate.

The AI Productivity Delusion

As with previous technological revolutions, it is natural to focus on AI's net effects: Will it create more than it destroys? But unlike previous eras of creative destruction, the real question this time is, “Create more of what?”

...

The question of whether AI will generate massive productivity gains is easy to answer: Yes. AI is already proving capable of exponentially increasing the amount of work that is being done per human worker. But as long as it is used to eliminate wage labor while syphoning off profits from actual markets into our tech lords’ cloud rents, the economic value produced per worker will tank.

I think he's agreeing with my assertion that GenAI can be a great productivity tool for experienced workers, but trying to use it to replace people (gawd, I hate chatbots so much!) is going to be a disaster.


Interesting, others besides me framing the whole GenAI bubble as drama. But they seem to be drinking the kool-aid. From the editors of Project Syndicate. After their intro, there are 7, count 'em, 7 very good articles on the GenAI drama, including the Yanis Varoufakis article we just linked to.

The AI Plot Thickens

When it comes to AI, it is difficult to know what to believe. Are the CEOs, researchers, and investors who tout the technology’s seemingly unlimited capabilities more credible, because they work directly with it, or less credible, because they stand to profit handsomely from further investment? While misplaced optimism could fuel a financial bubble, we have seen in recent months that underestimating the risks posed by AI could also carry other, even existential, costs.


From the "Productics by Igor" SubStack. I've known a couple of Igors, they were both very bright.

The Next Ten Years After the AI Bubble Bursts

$725 billion is being spent to serve a consumption pattern that NVIDIA is already shipping products to end

...

That the current pricing is not a business model but a subsidy, while every valuation assumes a demand curve that named buyers have already bent: Uber capping engineers at $1,500 a month, Microsoft cancelling most of its Claude Code licences, a third of Vercel’s gateway tokens now running on open weights for under 4% of the spend.

This is a very technical, very deep dive into the whole LLM circular investing mess. Maybe the biggest take-away: Nvidia is hedging desktop models against data center frontier models. Hmmm ...


From Cal Newport, a professor of computer science at Georgetown University and the author of “Deep Work”, via the New York Times.

Dear Congress: Here’s What You Should Ask A.I. Leaders

  • What specific types of A.I. technology are you worried about?

    My very 1st post on the Bullshit Apocalypse, I bemoaned the appropriation of the term "AI" by the LLM companies. I think this is the issue that is being raised here.

  • What are the safety procedures surrounding your research efforts? ...

  • What is the ultimate goal of your A.I. company? ...

We need to stop letting a small number of private companies, acting and talking in increasingly erratic ways, dictate how we’re supposed to feel about A.I. We’ve heard what they want to say; now it’s Congress’s turn to step in on our behalf to find out what’s really going on.


Here's the home page/directory for my posts on Bullshit. This is post #151.

Friday, September 25, 2026

The Hit Has Fit The Shan - September 22

GenAI things I have forgotten to rant & rave about:
  1. The LLMs are very bad at working outside the range of their training. They are not good at extrapolating. So they must continually be retrained, at huge cost. Really, really bad, expensive tech.

  2. Yet another annoying attempt to conflate LLMs with humans: the term "alignment". Will "AI" goals stay "aligned" with human goals?

    What BULLSHIT! LLMs do what they are told. They have no "goals" of their own.

    But, they are indeed very much like genies. Be careful what you wish for. "AI" agents will do stuff you would never have imagined in the pursuit of the goals you gave them. The have absolutely 0 CommonSense™.

    DO NOT USE THIS HORRIBLY UNTRUSTWORTHY TECHNOLOGY!


From Henry Farrell's Programable Mutter SubStack:

Machine god metaphors eat your brain

There are other ways of thinking about AI

I think we'll see this later from others. The basic idea: LLM output seems so much like human output, we naturally assume that there is something like a human intellect producing the LLM output.

Wrong, wrong, wrong. LLMs are statistics-based "next word" generators. They work NOTHING like the human brain.

The AI Lab companies have tried very hard to conflate LLMs with the human brain. For instance, "hallucinations" vs "errors" or "wrong answers".


From Douglas Rushkoff's SubStack:

Money is a Forever Chemical, AI is Forever Slop

How do we keep it from accumulating in the organs of a living culture?

China is giving away GenAI for free? How is the US GenAI industry supposed to get rid of its $1.5T debt???

This also revisits a Doctorow trope: all the AI slop being generated now is asbestos that we are building into the walls of our civilization. How many decades will it take for us to dig it all out?


Yawn. Yet again "AI" === "Actually Indians". From 404 Media:

Meta Tests Muse AI Agent Calls That Are Actually Made By Humans in a Call Center

"This has potential for so much negative PR. It could portray us as ‘their AI is not good enough so they still need humans’ kind of coverage for this launch."


Gary Marcus adds his $0.02 on the same story.

The secret behind Meta’s Muse

The new secret is the old secret


Here's the home page/directory for my posts on Bullshit. This is post #150.

Thursday, September 24, 2026

The Fit Has Hit The Shan - September 21

Wow. 10 days ago, in this post, I commented on how "AI" was now the story of stories, non-stop coverage on CNN, etc.

[Oh, of course, totally NOT just a distraction from the Epstein Files. Gawd knows we can't have 100s of rich old white men going to prison for raping underage girls.]

It's only gotten worse since then. Something Must Be Done About "AI".

I guess that's good. But, on the other hand, it is happening within the framework created by the AI labs:

- our products are so powerful, we can't control them!
- we need to slow down! Somebody stop us!
This is, IMO, COMPLETE & UTTER BULLSHIT!

All these "AIs" hacking other companies mostly shows that AI labs, OpenAI in particular, REALLY, REALLY SUCK AT COMPUTER SECURITY!

These kinds of attacks happened before GenAI. GenAI does appear to be very good at attacking other computers. So why are the AI Labs running these "tests" & screwing up so badly?

BECAUSE IT MAKES GREAT THEATER! Reality TV writ large.

They want to slow things down because THEIR PRODUCTS BASICALLY DON'T WORK.

So their strategy to keep the bubble inflated is, rope-a-dope, keep manufacturing "scary" incidents, & meanwhile, "pay no attention to the complete insanity of our business models."

I haven't seen anything about LLMs getting below their lowest error rate of 9%. I haven't seen anything about GenAI-based agents getting below a 10-50% error rate.

THIS TECHNOLOGY IS NOT TRUSTWORTHY! DON"T USE IT!

Wow, what fun, ranting & raving!

Meanwhile ... GenAI is the story of stories. But it's all based on, this is some transcendental technology.

The whole thing is actually based on 1 algorithm, the transformer, discovered by Google Translate researchers in 2017. It allows for parallel processing of text tokens, perfect for the matrix manipulation powers of GPUs.

Who would have dreamed that AutoComplete on Steroids could do all that GenAI does? But, a next-word-guessing algorithm, based on all the (stolen) content of our civilization, is not a framework that will ever get anywhere near anything vaguely like real, human intelligence.

Yes, a talking dog, a dancing bear: amazing things! But from Cory Doctorow last week:

"The wonder is not that the dancing bear dances well, it is that the bear dances at all."
Yes, the stuff LLMs produce is very impressive, but ...

It is still all "AI" slop. & guess what, the people hired by the AI Labs to provide human oversight on the models are using LLMs in their work. Can you say "Model Collapse"? Can you say "Degenerative AI"?

& even without the 9% error rate, there is still Semantic Ablation. & Stylistic Ablation. All of human writing, in a race to LLM mediocrity.

Yes, if you are a human who doesn't write well, using an LLM will make your writing much more impressive ... as long as you don't mind it reading like everyone else's writing.

I will repeat what I have said before: every experienced, senior software developer I know finds Claude Code to be a real productivity enhancer. GenAI is a useful tool as long as the people using it HAVE THE KNOWLEDGE & EXPERIENCE TO CHECK ITS OUTPUTS.

Otherwise, it is the road to hell.

Phew! I feel much better now! OK, time to slog through the accumulated posts ... 15 of them. :-( Hmmm, starting from September 21.


I think the whole NYT Opinions page was GenAI articles.

Bernie Sanders, Steve Case and Susan Rice on How to Avert A.I. Disaster

Given the risk that artificial intelligence may spiral out of control, more than 1,300 employees at A.I. companies have called for government intervention. President Trump announced on Saturday that he would create an “A.I. Force,” but continued to downplay A.I. risks. For the most part, Washington remains paralyzed.

To fill the gap, Times Opinion gathered proposals from six people, including a tech founder, a former OpenAI board member, a former national security adviser and a constitutional lawyer.

Proposals:

  • Bernie Sanders: Ban Superintelligence
  • Helen Toner: Investigate A.I. Incidents
  • Steve Case: Demand Disclosure
  • Susan E. Rice: Negotiate a Freeze With China
  • Cass R. Sunstein: Create a Regulatory Commission
  • Brad Smith: Require an Off Switch
Maybe "the Regulatory Commission" article espouses LICENSING. I have been pushing highly restrictive licensing on this powerful technology for a while now.

Why is the Orange Turd so behind GenAI? I think it's just like his backing of crypto. Originally he was dismissive of crypto, calling it "a scam". Then, "oh, wait, a scam? My speciality! Hell yeah, I'm onboard!" - to the tune of $1.4B profit on his ShitCoins.

I think it's the same with GenAI. He senses the grift.

Plus, his 2 older sons, Beavis Fredo & Butthead Fredo, are, of course, heavily invested in data center companies.

Ahhh, I love the smell of a grift in the morning!

I read something a couple of days ago, all the chips being bought, etc., but actually very few data centers are being built?!?!?


From 404 Media:

How AI Chatbots Are 'Deskilling' Human Empathy

Sherry Turkle's latest book, Artificial Intimacy: Who We Become When We Talk to Machines, comes out on September 29.

...

“When people turn to a chatbot, they don’t have to dread the fatigue of genuine give-and-take. And they don’t fear judgment or abandonment. But when we talk to chatbots, we lose the skills required to interact with humans, so chatbots start to feel like a better option. With an alternative, disappointment with people feels unnecessary,” Turkle writes.

Ugh?


The always reliable Gary Marcus seems excited by this. GenAI is indeed the Story of Stories:

Big news at the UN

Sometimes, maybe dreams come true?


From The Algorithmic Bridge, by Alberto Romero:

11 Charts the AI Industry Doesn’t Want You to See (pt. 2)

If there's an AI bubble, this is what it looks like

Hmmm, this requires a paid subscription to see the content. But, the pt. 1 of the series, May 29, seems to be available here.

These are indeed some interesting charts. Holy crap, here's #2, "THE CAPABILITIES OF AI HAVE BEEN EXAGGERATED". The blue is the claims, the red is the reality! Oops!


OK, that's it for Sep 21. It's 10:38 pm, I'll proof this, publish, then copy over to SubStack, hopefully to bed not too late. On to Sep 22 tomorrow.


Here's the home page/directory for my posts on Bullshit. This is post #149.

Tuesday, September 22, 2026

The Memory of Whiteness

"The Memory of Whiteness", by Kim Stanley Robinson, 1985, 352 pages, 107k words. Subtitled "A Scientific Romance".

Looking at his bibliography on Wikipedia, this appears to be 3rd novel of KSR - the bard of Climate Fiction. His 1st 2 novels in 1984 were "The Wild Shore" - which I bought as an Ace Special as I did "Neuromancer" by Gibson & "Green Eyes" by Shepard - & "IceHenge".

This is a novel about music. Speaking as a musician, I cannot remember a single novel which showcases music as effectively as this novel does.

I bought this novel because I did not remember reading it. Once I started it, I realized that I had already read it. But, 3-4 decades ago. It was worth a reread.

That being said, I found 2 parts of the novel annoying:

  1. The subplot, of the villian who heads a cult which is a sub/superset of another Solar System-wide cult. The cult members vie against each other to produce the best "metadrama", where they have tweaked real world events to produce the most drama. KMN, it's fucking reality TV! No wonder I found this so annoying!

  2. "Reader", & "dear Reader". I guess this is supposed to invoke some historical period? No idea when. Meanwhile, really annoying.
Also, the ending of the book is somewhat abrupt, and disappointing.

That said, some of the concert scenes, as the tour makes its way from Plutonian settlements down to the Sun, are indeed transcendental.

So, an uneven effort. Published when KSR was 32 YO - he's a year younger than me. Definitely worth a read.

IslandWalk Bird Charts, 2020-2025

I liked the way these charts came out for last season, so I will keep them updated.

Breaking news, I thought of 2 more charts that I think are a good summary of things:

  1. Water Birds: Swimmers; Divers; Divers, migratory; Waders + Beach; Ibis;
  2. Non-water Birds: Raptors; Corvids; Passerines.
These summary charts are at the bottom of this post.

Here is the cloned spreadsheet for these charts.

There are tabs in this spreadsheet for all the charts below.

The charts show the average count per species, mostly grouping the birds as in the annual reports.

I didn't do a Raptors chart; the Osprey and the Red-shouldered Hawk are our most common, but they only average 1-2. I included the smallest raptor, the Loggerhead Shrike, in with the common passerines, together with the Blue Jay, which was grouped with the Corvids.

  • Swimmers. Muscovy ducks, steadily down. Gallinule, steadily up. The high number for the Mottled Duck in 2023 may be from multiple observations of clutches of ducklings - up to 12 ducklings. These seem to undergo fairly rapid attrition - the following week there will be 7, the week after that 3.

  • Divers. Note, we have 3 divers from the surface of the lake, & 2 divers from the sky. The peak in Cormorant numbers in 2021 prompted me to worry about a Cormorant Menace. Cormorants were up this season, but so were Anhingas and Grebes.

  • Divers, Migratory. The large flock of Lesser Scaup - last season over 200 birds - that showed up for the prior 2 seasons did not show up this season.

  • Waders. The Wood Stork is different from the rest of these in that he feeds more like a dabbling duck: stick that huge bill into the water, swish it around, eat whatever's left. The others are visual hunters who spear or grab prey with their beaks.

    The Great Egret is now claarly our most numerous wader. My hypothesis is that, like the Gallinule, they like the spike rushes. The 2nd most numerous wader this season was the Wood Stork!

  • Ibis. These are kind of waders, but tbey forage in front & back lawns just as often. They feed by sticking their bills in the ground & wiggling them. Anything wiggles back, chomp! Plus their numbers are larger than the true waders.

  • (Passerine) Birds Observed > 75% of the Time. Our most common Passerine, the Common Grackle, was noticeably absent a few periods this season.


The 2 new charts: 1st, Water Birds. Note, Osprey & Bald Eagle both eat fish, but they are not included here.

Generally flat or trending up, which I think is good.

2nd, Non-water Birds.


Here's the home page/directory for my posts on Birdwatching in IslandWalk.

IslandWalk Birds, 2025-2026 Season

My overall birdwatching strategy for IslandWalk is posted here. I have made that post kind of the home page for my Birdwatching in IslandWalk project, and will update it whenever I do a new post on IW Birding.

This is my 6th report, here are the 1st 5:

  1. 2020-2021;
  2. 2021-2022 - the 1st post chronologically, it contains discussions of things I found interesting about a lot of the species - 10 seasons worth;
  3. 2022-2023.
  4. 2023-2024.
  5. 2024-2025.
For the 2025-2026 season, I was in IslandWalk October thru April, less 11 days in KY in November, 8 days on Guadeloupe in February, & 8 days in North Carolina in March.

I manually entered this season's data, 32 bird lists, in this spreadsheet. It doesn't take that long, and it gives me a good review of the data.

I will be reporting for all observed species the following 4 datapoints:

  1. % of days seen;
  2. total birds counted;
  3. average, of the days when the bird was counted; days when the bird wasn't counted don't go into the average;
  4. max.

Here's the link to the IslandWalk hotspot at eBird.org.

Each bird name listed below is linked to its IslandWalk activity page in eBird.org. So click on the name, you will get a picture & all the data eBird has on that bird in IslandWalk.

Note, I went through the eBird bird list for IslandWalk looking for new species. There were 17! I decided to put them into a separate table at the end. I will merge them with the main list for next season.

I set the cut date for pushing into next year's report as April 30.


Swimmers

I guess all are dabbling "ducks"? "Dabbling" === "stick your bill down in the water & swish it around & eat what you get from that" - as opposed to diving ducks.
  • mottled duck: % days 100; tot 936; avg 29.3; max 64.
  • muscovy duck: % days 96; tot 162; avg 5.2; max 12.
  • common gallinule: % days 100; tot 1290; avg 40.3; max 73. After 1st being counted in IW by me 2020-04-02, their #s continue to grow - they have passed the mottled duck as our most populous water fowl species by a good margin. The gallinule seem to like the spike rushes.
  • american coot: % days 66; tot 94; avg 4.5; max 8.
  • egyptian goose: % days 0.
  • canvasback: % days 0.

Divers

We did not get large numbers of any of the Canadian migratory diving duck species as we did in the last couple of years.

Waders

  • great egret: % days 100; tot 279; avg 8.7; max 17. Back to being our most numerous wader. Their average counts was double digits for a lot of the season. I think they like the spike rushes.
  • great blue heron: % days 75; tot 43; avg 1.8; max 4. I think they also like the spike rushes.
  • snowy egret: % days 81; tot 60; avg 2.3; max 13.
  • cattle egret: % days 0.
  • tricolored heron: % days 100; tot 103; avg 3.2; max 6.
  • little blue heron: % days 94; tot 135; avg 4.5; max 12. #s up a bit, passing tricolored heron.
  • green heron: % days 56; tot 22; avg 1.2; max 2.
  • wood stork: % days 91; tot 140; avg 4.8; max 11. #s up considerably, particularly early in the season.
  • white ibis: % days 100; tot 592; avg 18.5; max 53.
  • glossy ibis: % days 81; tot 130; avg 5.0; max 24.
  • limpkin: % days 97; tot 136; avg 4.4; max 10. #s still up, slightly above last season.

Beach Birds

Raptors

Corvids

  • fish crow: % days 88; tot 286; avg 10.2; max 50. I am increasingly thinking it is pointless to count crows. The proper caw goes out, 100 crows can gather in 30 seconds or so. Well, I guess it is interesting to see what the biggest gathering we get is.
  • blue jay: % days 88; tot 239; avg 8.5; max 23. #s down a bit from last season. I doubt it's significant.

Perching Birds (Passerines)


We had 17 new species recorded in eBird for IslandWalk last season! IMO, that's a lot! I am including these in a separate table here, as I did not observe any of them on my X or X2 walks. Next season, I will incorporate them into the master list above.

10 for the indefatigable Pete Laviola, 3 for his mentor George Eschenbach, 2 for Michael Gow, who is a serious birder who teaches school in MA & visits his parents in IW over Christmas, & 2 for me.

#Common NameBirderDate
1Eastern BluebirdPete Laviola2025-07-03
2Black-bellied Whistling-DuckPete Laviola2025-07-03
3Cliff SwallowPete Laviola2025-08-24
4Northern Yellow WarblerPete Laviola2025-09-02
5Hermit ThrushPete Laviola2025-10-20
6Swamp SparrowPete Laviola2025-10-24
7Yellow-crowned Night HeronPete Laviola2025-10-24
8White-winged DovePete Laviola2025-10-27
9Ruby-throated Hummingbirdchris heinz2025-11-02
10Wild TurkeyGeorge Eschenbach2025-11-05
11Ruby-crowned KingletMichael Gow2025-12-25
12Yellow-throated VireoMichael Gow2025-12-25
13Western TanagerGeorge Eschenbach2025-12-31
14Wilson's Snipechris heinz2026-01-29
15Barred OwlGeorge Eschenbach2026-02-16
16Northern Rough-winged SwallowPete Laviola2026-04-17
17Swainson's ThrushPete Laviola2026-05-02

Monday, September 21, 2026

Sleep and the Soul

"Sleep and the Soul", by Greg Egan, 2023, 386 pages, 119k words, 10 stories.

I think this collection turned up at a bargain price on BookBub. It is a good collection, not too long. [I have lately increasingly noticed that I seem to do better with smaller doses of things. I've known that about fine art museums for decades, I've recently also noticed it for other museums and music festivals. Now short story collections as well?]

Egan quite often uses his great knowledge of physics & computing to come up with a novel hypothesis of how the world could be different, and then explore that hypothesis. It can be somewhat stilted at times.

The 1st few stories weren't like that, nice! There were a couple of stories that involved circadian rhythms - I wonder if Egan has sleep issues?

I think the longer story "Light Up The Clouds" was the most memorable. An unusual world, a very adventurous science project lead to a completely unexpected conclusion.

This was a very good collection. I need to remember to keep up with Egan's fairly prolific output. He just turned 65 YO, hopefully he'll keep writing for a good while longer.