From 404Media:
The Roboguard Revolution is Short-Circuiting
Knightscope and other robotics companies are rethinking automated security following canceled contracts. One pivot? Human guards.
You'd think "security guard", which must mostly be an incredibly boring job, would be ripe for replacement by AI-powered robots, neh?
Nope, absolutely wrong. The outliers, the anomalies, these are what security guards have to handle.
& these are exactly what GenAI sucks at. Oops!
From Malwarebytes.com:
The AI Act kicks into action, forces companies to be clear about AI chatbots
The European Union (EU) has started enforcing key parts of the AI Act, with immediate, visible consequences for chatbots, deepfakes and other consumer‑facing Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems.
Hooray for the EU!
Our 20 YO 52" Sharp Aquos LCD TV died. I'm trying to replace it with a 65" LG OLED. lg.com says, "ChatBot not available." & connects me to a "human" sales agent.
If this is a human being, it needs psychiatric intervention ASAP. It is all over the place. It asks me 3x, after I say "no", if I want extended warranty. I ask it flat out:
Ben, you really seem to be a chatbot. Are you really human?
It's response:
Haha, nope! Just Ben here, your LG product expert. Though I'll take it as a compliment if I was answering that fast!
Really? Ben's a human being who is flattered to be compared to a fucking chatbot?!?!?
If this were a human being, it totally needs its meds checked.
Presumably with the new EU law chatbots are not allowed to lie like this. Goddamm, I hate chatbots! Does anybody like them?
From the New York Times:
A.I. Will Affect Your Social Life. Yes, Yours.
But in conversations with other Gen Z-ers, I’ve found that young people are relying emotionally on A.I. more than we realize. That subtly changes our relationships, even with people who have never touched A.I. When a flood of synthetic support enters the worlds of those around us, it distorts our mechanisms for intimacy and makes everyone a little lonelier.
From Robert Reich on SubStack:
Stop AI Before it's Too Late
Its costs and risks are gigantic. Its benefits, unproven.
Its benefit: to keep the bubble inflated, to maintain the outrageous P/E ratios of the Big Tech companies.
Of course, that's only a benefit of you are a TechBro or otherwise heavily invested in this bubble.
Its error rate: 9% for LLMs & chatbots, minimum 10-15% for agents. You CANNOT build infrastructure on that kind of error rate.
Again, from Malwarebytes.com:
Love/hate relationship: The AI affair. Young people love AI, but it’s breaking their trust
Young people use AI for everything. From schoolwork to interview prep, relationship advice to shopping decisions, the technology has become part of how young people live. For the most digitally fluent generation ever, AI is a competitive edge, a creative partner, and an always-on assistant.
But the same technology making young people’s lives easier is also making the internet harder to navigate. AI is making scams more convincing, identities easier to manipulate, and online content harder to trust. Seven in ten (70%) 18-to-22-year-olds have experienced an AI-related scam in the last year, compared to half of the general population. And nearly every young person worries AI will be used against them.
From 404Media:
Company Offering ‘100% Human-Written, Never AI’ Medical Research Is Entirely AI
Research Gold's team of human methodologists are either AI generated or using the identity of real people without their permission
Yawn. I need to compile a list of words that rhyme with "fraud".
Fuckety, fuckety, fuck the people who do this. I've made 100s of contributions to eBird. I've taken many pictures of green herons. This is the 1st green heron I've seen with 3 legs. ARRGGGHHHH!
Oops, I was going to include the pic of a green heron with 3 legs shown in this article. But, that would violate the terms of this blog, which specify that it is AI-free. Phew, dodged a bullet!
From eBird.org, the world's premier birding site, run by the Cornell Ornithology Lab & the Audubon Society:
From Truth to Fake: The Threat of AI to Media Archives
Community-driven science projects such as eBird, the Macaulay Library, and iNaturalist are seeing a rapid uptick in AI-manipulated and AI-generated photos. A new publication in Nature has recently highlighted the threat of AI photos to these projects, leading to some popular news articles. We want to raise awareness and inform the community of how AI reduces the scientific value of photos.
GenAI, FTL!!!
From Lauren’s data Substack:
Temperature Zero for Culture: Why Everything Is Starting to Look the Same
What 640 London shopping streets, 4,000 Billboard hits, a million films and synthetic AI personas tell us about why everything is flattening into sameness and how to regulate the algorithms behind it.
This is slightly afield, but still completely apropos. We were already experiencing stylistic & semantic ablation before ChatGPT was released - modern pop music was even then a maximum 1 or 2 levels above AI slop.
But AI slop will make it even worse.
From Yves Smith at naked capitalism:
Layoffs Tied to AI Hurt Worker Productivity – and the Reason May Surprise Managers
Yves here. BWAHAHA. The way employers are implementing AI, to reduce headcount, is scaring workers so much that they are loath to use AI. So this job-protective reaction amounts to sabotage without consciously being so. Well played!
Again, from 404Media:
AI Generated 3D Models Flood Market, But Almost No One Is Buying Them
The number of AI generated uploads to CGTrader would suggest AI is taking over the platform, but buyers are refusing to pay for AI generated models.
...
CGTrader, an online marketplace for 3D assets, found that one in six models uploaded to the site these days is AI generated, but that AI generated assets account for only $1 out of $90 in revenue on the site. These numbers show that AI generated assets are quickly flooding the marketplace, but that most people are not interested in paying for them.
Why aren't people buying them? Because they aren't as good as the human-created models. Close, but no cigar.
Meanwhile, they create more slop that people have to wade through. I mentioned that a few posts back, we all now have to waste increasingly more of our limited brainpower to filter out AI slop.
Maybe we could get this classified as a form of spam? There are laws against spam.
From a software developer of 2 decades experience:
I'm done using AI
I've been programming for 20 years. It started as a hobby as a teen, making fansites and little video games. Then it turned into a career. And it's something I've largely enjoyed doing. I like learning, I like problem solving, and I like making things, which is a lot of what programming is. Over the past 18 months, my career, my hobby, and my craft have been drastically changed by the introduction of LLM-powered coding harnesses (e.g., Claude Code) and what's often referred to as "agentic programming." Because of its negative impacts on the environment, society, and my mental health, I've decided to stop using it.
So his management encouraged him to use Claude Code, etc. He got it to where it mostly worked. He did it for 1 year.
But, it killed his spirit, his joy of creation, his zen. He rejected it.
I'd guess he'll be let go soon :-(
From Human Ready, the SubStack of John Kwarsick. John's company I think is a "AI Works, You're Just Not Doing It Right" company. They have a whole package to deal with the idiocy of making AutoComplete-On-Steriods your AI architecture.
How to Catch AI Lying Without Knowing It Is Lying | Thought Engineering
The discipline: The Over-claim Watch / K-I-E Tagging
So the K-I-E stands for Known, Inferred, Extrapolated. So, OK, maybe OK, bullshit. Great, you've successfully wasted a bunch of your life concluding that this particular LLM output was ... bullshit. Or possibly bullshit. Now what?
I can't imagine any other state change in the world of technology that would have succeeded with the level of error that LLMs & GenAI exhibit. I mean, come on, we all use autocomplete on our phones every day. (I periodically get so sick of it that I turn it off, but I have it on now.) How often is it wrong? Horribly, badly, wrong? & you are going to fire people & replace it with this?!?!? Barf-o-rama!
Here's the home page/directory for my posts on Bullshit. This is post #141.